feedback
Jump to thread:

~ Obama wants to abolish "don't ask, don't tell ~

24 messages. 6 contributors. Last post on Nov 13, 2009 6:49AM.
23 posts
#1
Kirsti P (Laquey, Missouri, USA)
Oct 16, 2009 6:03PM
Does he know what he is going to do by doing this? I want to get this out first and foremost, I have nothing against the homosexual community. I however do not believe in what they are doing. But, Obama has never been in the military. There are regulations against satumy (sorry if i spelled that wrong.. :\) and if it is commited then they will be discharged from the military. It really is not a wise descion to make. It will cause alot of problems in the military and else where.
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Oct 21, 2009 11:03AM
sodomy- its anal sex and plently of straight people have it too.
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Oct 21, 2009 11:03AM
sorry, double post:)
207 posts
Patrick P (Springtown, Texas, USA)
Oct 21, 2009 1:55PM
Actually, sodomy also encompasses oral sex and another other form or sexual action that involves two or more participants that has no possibility of creating children.

So, sodomy laws affected a lot more than homosexuals.
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Oct 22, 2009 7:54AM
true.
23 posts
Kirsti P (Laquey, Missouri, USA)
Oct 23, 2009 8:52PM
I know what sodomy..(sorry for spelling it wrong earlier) is. I never once said I had anything against homosexuals or bisexuals. One of my best friends is bisexual and I love him to death. It doesn't mean that I approve of what he does or that I want to know what he does. But it is not my place to judge, it is Gods. Therefore, I am not judging anyone about what they do.
143 posts
#2
Sonny X ( Illinois, USA)
Oct 17, 2009 12:11AM
There's more to the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy that isn't written down. This policy is there to protect unit cohesion, not to protect the rights of homosexuals. Obama is going way to far with stuff he doesn't know about.
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Oct 21, 2009 11:03AM
....wrong posting spot:)
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Oct 22, 2009 8:03AM
I ve read this over again, and while at first I tried to be understanding of your point there, I dont agree with it.

You see the same thing happens with other issues. A few years ago it was religion and getting paganism recognized as a true religious group, if you will. They denied its acknowlegement in the military because such a religion had lies spread about it and it made some uncomfortable.

Something will always make someone else uncomfortable, so should you always avoid that something to please others?

Before it was Blacks, Then it was women. Followed by NonAbrahamic Religious People. Now its homosexual/bisexuals.

When is it going to stop? No matter which way you look at it, its still discrimination and therefore still wrong. Discrimination being defined as: unfair treatment of a person or group on the basis of prejudice ; the cognitive process whereby two or more stimuli are distinguished .
566 posts
Christine B (West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA)
Oct 27, 2009 7:23PM
i feel like obama should not mess with the military and things he doesnt know...

i feel like its not relevant to take away it--i mean i dont go around saying i am straight...no one care..you are not required to say whether you are or not..you can be gay in the military you just dont say
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Oct 29, 2009 9:26AM
Its actually is relevant, I am a member of the Courage Campaign( basically GSA 4 grown ups,and also a dem led group to find genreral equality for any and everyone who is a US citizen) and a number of openly gay men in the military are being court marshalled for being open. Its a very big deal, just kept hush hush.

and whilw you may not be required to keep it quiet(being heterosexual), others may be.
23 posts
Kirsti P (Laquey, Missouri, USA)
Nov 01, 2009 8:35PM
Obama has never even been in the military. He has no clue what goes on. My father is active duty. Therefore, I know the regulations.. and so do the homosexuals in the military. If they dont want to be kicked out of the military they should be quiet, hince the "dont ask, dont tell" policy.
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Nov 02, 2009 12:13PM
its "hence" and as a Navy Brat, as the saying goes, The idea of banning dont ask dont tell, is based on the notion that equality doesnt take a second seat to group unity.

The fact he wasnt in the military means nothing to this discussion. I am not Christian, but I would not take a Christian's rights away. the point is the same. You neednt be in that particular situaton to be able to relate to others who have such experiences.
566 posts
Christine B (West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA)
Nov 03, 2009 5:50PM
not trying to be rude but i genuinely want to know what rights are being violated in not asking someone's sexual orientation?
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Nov 04, 2009 9:43AM
what i am getting at is that requiring(dont ask dont tell or be courtmarshalled) someone to be closeted as a homo/bisexual isnt right. To some being a closeted homosexual is like asking them to lie and be okay with everyone's assumption you are like them and it also treats them unequally. You are correct their are (in most states) no laws that actually protect nonheterosexuals from discrimination.
566 posts
Christine B (West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA)
Nov 05, 2009 4:03PM
ok thanks
23 posts
Kirsti P (Laquey, Missouri, USA)
Nov 09, 2009 10:56AM
They know the rules. If they don't want to be persecuted for the way that they are, they should keep it to themselves. I have nothing against homosexuals, my best friend is bisexual. They know what society thinks about it, so if they do not want the problems they should just keep their personal lives to themselves. If they don't mind what others think then go for it. More power to you.
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Nov 09, 2009 12:03PM
isnt the persecution the problem?
23 posts
Kirsti P (Laquey, Missouri, USA)
Nov 10, 2009 12:32PM
I don't understand what you mean.
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Nov 11, 2009 1:00PM
"They know the rules. If they don't want to be persecuted for the way that they are, they should keep it to themselves"

isnt the persecution a problem to you?

do you like knowing people like your friend, if honest, are persecuted?
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Nov 11, 2009 1:05PM
personally, as a friend of many GLBT people, persecution of any type sucks.
23 posts
Kirsti P (Laquey, Missouri, USA)
Nov 12, 2009 12:59PM
No I don't but what can I do to help. I still have my religion that I believe with all my heart. It is not my place to judge anyone.
1126 posts
Amanda V (Clayton, North Carolina, USA)
Nov 13, 2009 6:49AM
I am by no means saying you cant have your religion, I wouldnt say that unless yours consisted of , no offense, Scientology. lol, I dont mean to say that one cannot say this life style is wrong because, while I may disagree with you, that is your opinion.

What I am saying is that our governement and other organizations that are related to the governement (the military being one of them), should not persecute people due to their sexuality. Sexuality(not sexual preference, since that insinuates a choice) is something people cannot change. Ex: Can you change yours if God didnt exist to you? Most likely no, because you probably are not attrracted to women as a woman.

However there are those people who are attracted to those of their same sex and saying you wont judge, but still allow the persecution to exist is judging them not fit to have the same rights as another non-homo/bisexual person.